Speaking Boost · B2 · Lesson 18 of 50
Speaking Boost B2 · Block 4: Technology and AI

Why did the world prepare for the Y2K bug?

At the end of 1999 many people feared that computers would stop working at midnight. Learn to talk about past predictions with future-in-the-past forms and to report questions, and discuss when a warning is worth taking seriously.

1

Warm-up

5 min
1.1

Computers and risk

Answer each question with 2–3 sentences.

  1. Do you remember the year 2000, or have you heard about it?
  2. Have you ever worried about something that did not happen?
  3. What predictions about the future were made when you were younger?
  4. How do you decide if a warning is serious?
  5. Have you ever lost important computer files?
  6. How do you prepare for problems at work or at home?
2

Words and phrases

12 min
2.1

New words

Read each word and the example. Then say a sentence about risk.

2.2

Which word?

Choose the word that fits.

  1. The was caused by computers that stored years with two digits.
  2. Experts gave a clear about possible problems.
  3. Only a few small were reported on 1 January.
  4. Thousands of worked to update old software.
  5. There was a short power , not a disaster.
  6. Countries spent a lot of money as a .
  7. Many people thought computers would at midnight.
  8. Careful preparation may have helped to a disaster.
2.3

Opposites and pairs

Choose the right answer, then press Check answers.

  1. a bug is a mistake in a
  2. a prediction is a statement about what
  3. to crash = to suddenly
  4. a precaution is an action to
  5. a glitch is a
  6. a catastrophe is a very
2.4

Useful phrases

Use these phrases to talk about past predictions.

  • People thought that... would...Люди думали, що...People thought that computers would stop working.
  • It was going to be...Це мало бути...It was going to be a disaster.
  • It was supposed to...Це мало б...The system was supposed to work after 2000.
  • They asked whether...Вони запитали, чи...They asked whether the planes would fly.
  • He wanted to know if...Він хотів знати, чи...He wanted to know if the banks were safe.
  • In hindsight,...Заднім числом,...In hindsight, the warnings were exaggerated.
  • Looking back,...Озираючись назад,...Looking back, the preparation was worth it.
  • It turned out that...Виявилося, що...It turned out that very few systems failed.
3

Read and react

8 min
3.1

The Y2K bug

Read the text. Hover over the dotted words for help.

Why did the world prepare for the Y2K bug?

In the 1960s and 1970s, computer memory was expensive, so many programmers saved space by writing years with two digits, for example "75" for 1975. As the year 2000 came closer, experts warned that "00" might be read as 1900, and that some systems could fail.

Some people predicted that banks would close, planes would crash and power stations would stop. Governments and companies spent huge sums on checking and updating their systems; the total is often estimated in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Thousands of programmers worked for years on the problem.

When midnight arrived on 1 January 2000, there were only a few small glitches. Planes did not fall from the sky, and most systems continued to work. Journalists asked whether the whole thing had been just hype.

Experts disagree. Some say that the preparation was the reason for the quiet night, and that the warning had worked. Others say that countries which did less preparation also had few problems, so the danger was exaggerated.

Whatever the truth, the Y2K bug is remembered as a lesson: it is hard to prove that a disaster was prevented.

Would you have taken the warnings seriously?

3.2

True or false?

  1. Programmers used two digits to save computer memory.
  2. Planes fell from the sky on 1 January 2000.
  3. Some countries that did less preparation also had few problems.
  4. All experts agree that the preparation was necessary.
  5. The text says it is hard to prove that a disaster was prevented.
3.3

What do you think?

  1. Was the world right to prepare, or did it overreact?
  2. How can we tell if a warning is serious or just hype?
  3. What other warnings have turned out differently from the predictions?
  4. What risks today deserve more attention?
4

Grammar for speaking

10 min
4.1

Grammar for speaking

Future in the past

Use would, was / were going to and was / were supposed to to talk about what people expected at a time in the past.

People thought computers would stop working. It was going to be a disaster. The system was supposed to work after 2000.

Reported questions

Use if or whether, or the question word, with statement word order and no do, does or did. The tense moves back.

"Will the planes fly?" → They asked whether the planes would fly. "Where is the problem?" → He asked where the problem was.

Block 4 review

Use the grammar from this block.

reported statements (L16) · the passive for processes (L17)

Common mistakes: statement order in reported questions, and would for the future in the past. ✗ He asked where was the problem → He asked where the problem was. ✗ People thought it will fail → People thought it would fail.

4.2

Choose the right form

  1. People thought that computers
    working.
  2. It
    be a disaster, they said.
  3. The system
    work after 2000.
  4. They asked
    the planes would fly.
  5. He asked where the problem
    .
  6. She wanted to know
    the banks were safe.
  7. They asked me
    .
  8. He asked
    we had checked the system.
4.3

Fix the mistake

Each sentence has one mistake. Type the correct words.

  1. They asked if would the planes fly. →
  2. He asked where was the problem. →
  3. She asked me what did I know. →
  4. People thought that computers will stop. →
  5. They asked that the banks were safe. →
  6. It supposed to be a disaster. →
4.4

Talk about it

Answer in detail. Use would, was going to and reported questions.

  1. What do you remember about the year 2000?
  2. What predictions about the future were made when you were younger?
  3. What was expected to happen but did not?
  4. Have you ever worried about something that didn't happen?
  5. When is a warning worth taking seriously?
  6. How can we prepare for a risk without panicking?
5

Three people look back and a short talk

8 min
5.1

Three people look back

Three people look back on Y2K. Compare their views. Who thinks the preparation was necessary? Who is the most doubtful? What do you think?

Person 1

Helen, 52

  • Was a programmer in 1999
  • Worked nights to update systems
  • Says the warnings were serious
  • Thinks the success was invisible
Person 2

Mr Brown, 60

  • Owned a shop in 1999
  • Bought extra food and candles
  • Remembers that nothing happened
  • Laughs about it now
Person 3

Dr Patel, 44

  • Is an economist
  • Studies risk
  • Says the cost was huge
  • Asks whether the money was wisely spent
5.2

Mini-talk: predictions and warnings

Your teacher will time you.

  1. Plan for one minute, then speak for one or two minutes.
  2. Part 1: something that people expected to happen but didn't (future in the past).
  3. Part 2: a question you were asked recently (reported questions).
  4. Part 3: how to prepare for a risk without panic.
2:00
6

Personal questions

10 min
6.1

Part I: Me

  1. Do you remember a big worry from your childhood?
  2. Have you ever bought extra food because of a warning?
  3. What did people predict about the year 2000, as far as you know?
  4. How do you back up your files?
  5. What would you do if the internet stopped for a day?
  6. Do you trust weather forecasts?
  7. What was the last warning you took seriously?
  8. Do you read the news every day?
6.2

Part II: Other people

  1. Who in your family worries a lot?
  2. Who is always calm?
  3. Who works with computers?
  4. Who asked you a difficult question last week?
  5. Who do you know that predicted something correctly?
  6. Who gives you advice on technology?
6.3

Part III: A bit deeper

  1. Should governments spend money to prevent possible problems?
  2. Are the media responsible for hype?
  3. Is it better to prepare too much or too little?
  4. Can we ever be fully prepared for a technology failure?
  5. Do we depend too much on computers?
7

Roleplay

12 min
7.1

Interviewing an expert

You

Journalist

You interview a former programmer (your teacher) about 1999:
  • ask what people expected
  • ask what he did
  • ask if the money was well spent
  • report what he said to your readers
Speak for at least 2 minutes in total. Use future in the past and reported questions.
Your teacher

Former programmer

Says things like:
  1. We thought systems would fail.
  2. We worked for months.
  3. Nothing happened because we prepared.
  4. Some say it was hype.
7.2

Reporting questions

You

Candidate

After an interview, you tell a friend (your teacher) what the interviewer asked:
  • say who asked you
  • report three questions
  • say how you answered
  • say how you feel
You do most of the talking. Use: She asked me whether... · He wanted to know what...
Your teacher

Friend

Says things like:
  1. How did it go?
  2. What did they ask?
  3. What did you answer?
  4. Do you think you'll get it?
8

Homework

at home

Your homework score

Do all four exercises, then press Check all homework. Correct answers will appear next to your mistakes.

– / 30
H1

Complete with a word

bugwarningglitchesprogrammersoutageprecautioncrashprevent
  1. The was caused by computers that stored years with two digits.
  2. Experts gave a clear about possible problems.
  3. Only a few small were reported on 1 January.
  4. Thousands of worked to update old software.
  5. There was a short power , not a disaster.
  6. Countries spent a lot of money as a .
  7. Many people thought computers would at midnight.
  8. Careful preparation may have helped to a disaster.
H2

Choose the correct form

  1. They thought the plane late.
  2. She asked me .
  3. He asked I was ready.
  4. It rain, but it didn't.
  5. They wanted to know we had finished.
  6. The meeting start at nine.
  7. He asked what time the shop .
  8. I thought it easy.
H3

Correct or incorrect?

Decide if each sentence is grammatically correct.

  1. People thought computers would stop working.
  2. People thought that computers will stop.
  3. They asked whether the planes would fly.
  4. He asked where was the problem.
  5. She wanted to know if the banks were safe.
  6. They asked that the banks were safe.
  7. The system was supposed to work after 2000.
H4

Match the two halves

  1. People thought that computers
  2. It was going to be
  3. The system was supposed
  4. They asked whether
  5. He wanted to know if
  6. In hindsight,
  7. It turned out that

Finished the lesson?

Mark it as complete to keep track of your progress.